SINTERFACE

Foam Formation · Dynamic Interfaces

Foam Formation
& Foamability

Creation of gas-liquid interfacial area, dynamic adsorption and stabilization during foam generation.

In this article

Jump to a section

01 · Foam formation

Creation of gas-liquid interfacial area

Foam generation requires creation of a large gas-liquid interfacial area. Mechanical agitation, sparging, shaking, whipping, turbulent mixing and gas injection are common routes. The energetic cost of area creation is governed initially by the surface tension of the interface at the relevant age. During rapid generation, dynamic rather than equilibrium surface tension is therefore the appropriate quantity. [P1, P2, 1, 2, 7]

Interfacial work

dW = γ dA

02 · Dynamic adsorption

Adsorption during rapid surface creation

If adsorption is slower than interface creation, the new bubble surface can retain a tension close to that of the pure solvent during the earliest stages. Rapidly adsorbing surfactants reduce this cost more effectively on process timescales. Foam formation is thus connected directly to adsorption kinetics. [P1, P2, 1, 2, 7]

03 · Bubble stabilization

Generating bubbles is only the first step

Generating bubbles is only the first step. Newly formed bubbles collide and may coalesce before they enter a stable foam network. Stabilization therefore requires sufficiently rapid formation of adsorption layers and sufficiently persistent liquid films between approaching bubbles. [P2, P4, 8, 1, 2]

The role of surfactants is not simply to lower surface tension. Surface concentration gradients created during rapid deformation produce Marangoni stresses, and the adsorption layer can possess dilational and shear viscoelasticity. These properties oppose local expansion and can slow film thinning or redistribute liquid toward disturbed regions. [P2, P4, 8, 1, 2]

04 · Fundamental distinction

Foamability is not foam stability

Foamability is the ability of a liquid to generate a foam under a defined gas input or mechanical protocol. Stability is the resistance of that foam to decay after its generation. A system can be highly foamable but unstable if films rupture rapidly, or weakly foamable but long-lived once a foam has formed. Any analytical method should state which property is being measured. [P1, P2, 1, 2, 7]

05 · Multiscale interpretation

From foam generation to molecular adsorption layers

A foam consists of gas bubbles separated by liquid structures. At high liquid fraction, bubbles are nearly spherical and separated by relatively thick liquid layers. As liquid drains, bubbles deform into polyhedral shapes and the liquid becomes concentrated in Plateau borders and nodes. The faces between neighboring bubbles are thin liquid films bounded by two adsorption layers. [P2, P4, 8, 1, 2]

The Miller’s lecture introduces a top-down view of foam precisely because no single structural level explains the whole system. A macroscopic foam column can be analyzed through its height, liquid content and lifetime. At the next scale, individual bubbles and Plateau borders determine capillary pressure and drainage. At still smaller scales, thin films control whether neighboring bubbles remain separated or coalesce. Finally, the properties of those films depend on the molecular adsorption layers at their two surfaces. [P1, P2, 3, 6, 8]

Multiscale structure of a foam from the macroscopic foam to bubbles, thin liquid films and molecular adsorption layers.

This hierarchy is central to the 2018 monograph edited by Exerowa, Gochev, Platikanov, Liggieri and Miller. The scientific logic runs from adsorption layers through liquid films to real foams rather than treating foam volume as an isolated empirical property. [P2, P4, 8, 1, 2]

References

Scientific literature

  1. 1.D. Exerowa and P. M. Kruglyakov, Foam and Foam Films: Theory, Experiment, Application, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1998.
  2. 2.D. Exerowa, G. Gochev, D. Platikanov, L. Liggieri and R. Miller (Eds.), Foam Films and Foams: Fundamentals and Applications, CRC Press, 2018.
  3. 3.Khr. Khristov, D. Exerowa, L. Christov, A. V. Makievski and R. Miller, Foam analyzer: An instrument based on the foam pressure drop technique, Review of Scientific Instruments 75 (2004).

Complete scientific review

Foam
Analysis

Read full review